|
|
Registro Completo |
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Semiárido. |
Data corrente: |
19/02/2021 |
Data da última atualização: |
16/12/2021 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
Autoria: |
BARROS, J. A. R.; GUIMARÃES, M. J. M.; SIMOES, W. L.; MELO, N. F. de; ANGELOTTI, F. |
Afiliação: |
Juliane Rafaele Alves Barros; Miguel Julio Machado Guimarães; WELSON LIMA SIMOES, CPATSA; NATONIEL FRANKLIN DE MELO, CPATSA; FRANCISLENE ANGELOTTI, CPATSA. |
Título: |
Water restriction in different phenological stages and increased temperature affect cowpea production. |
Ano de publicação: |
2021 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Ciência e Agrotecnologia, v. 45, e022120, 2021. |
DOI: |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-705420214502212 |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Conteúdo: |
Water deficit and high temperatures are abiotic factors that most limit plant growth and development. However, its effects depend on crop development stage and on stress duration and intensity. Thus, the objective of was to evaluate the development of cowpea subjected to water restriction in different phenological stages and to increase in air temperature. The experiment was conducted with the cultivar ?Carijó?, in growth chambers, in a 4 x 3 x 2 factorial arrangement, corresponding to levels of water availability (25, 50, 75, and 100%,), phenological stages (vegetative, flowering and pod filling) and temperature regimes (T°1: 20-26-33 °C e T°2: 24.8-30.8-37.8 °C), respectively. Reduction of water availability in the vegetative and flowering stages caused decrease in grain production. The percentage of aborted flowers was higher in plants maintained under an increased temperature of +4.8 °C, with consequent reduction in grain production. Higher water availability values favored shoot and root dry mass production. Increase of 4.8 °C did not affect shoot and root dry mass but reduced water use efficiency by about 83%. The highest enzymatic activities of CAT, GPX and SOD were found in plants subjected to the temperature of +4.8 °C. Only APX showed lower enzymatic activity with increasing temperature. The cv. ?Carijó? is more sensitive to the 4.8 °C increase in air temperature than to water deficits. |
Palavras-Chave: |
Aumento da temperatura; Estágios fenológicos; Restrição hídrica. |
Thesagro: |
Feijão; Fenologia; Temperatura; Vigna Unguiculata. |
Thesaurus Nal: |
Abiotic stress; Oxidative stress; Phenology. |
Categoria do assunto: |
F Plantas e Produtos de Origem Vegetal |
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/221343/1/Water-restriction-in-different-2021.pdf
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02342naa a2200301 a 4500 001 2130154 005 2021-12-16 008 2021 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 024 7 $ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-705420214502212$2DOI 100 1 $aBARROS, J. A. R. 245 $aWater restriction in different phenological stages and increased temperature affect cowpea production.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2021 520 $aWater deficit and high temperatures are abiotic factors that most limit plant growth and development. However, its effects depend on crop development stage and on stress duration and intensity. Thus, the objective of was to evaluate the development of cowpea subjected to water restriction in different phenological stages and to increase in air temperature. The experiment was conducted with the cultivar ?Carijó?, in growth chambers, in a 4 x 3 x 2 factorial arrangement, corresponding to levels of water availability (25, 50, 75, and 100%,), phenological stages (vegetative, flowering and pod filling) and temperature regimes (T°1: 20-26-33 °C e T°2: 24.8-30.8-37.8 °C), respectively. Reduction of water availability in the vegetative and flowering stages caused decrease in grain production. The percentage of aborted flowers was higher in plants maintained under an increased temperature of +4.8 °C, with consequent reduction in grain production. Higher water availability values favored shoot and root dry mass production. Increase of 4.8 °C did not affect shoot and root dry mass but reduced water use efficiency by about 83%. The highest enzymatic activities of CAT, GPX and SOD were found in plants subjected to the temperature of +4.8 °C. Only APX showed lower enzymatic activity with increasing temperature. The cv. ?Carijó? is more sensitive to the 4.8 °C increase in air temperature than to water deficits. 650 $aAbiotic stress 650 $aOxidative stress 650 $aPhenology 650 $aFeijão 650 $aFenologia 650 $aTemperatura 650 $aVigna Unguiculata 653 $aAumento da temperatura 653 $aEstágios fenológicos 653 $aRestrição hídrica 700 1 $aGUIMARÃES, M. J. M. 700 1 $aSIMOES, W. L. 700 1 $aMELO, N. F. de 700 1 $aANGELOTTI, F. 773 $tCiência e Agrotecnologia$gv. 45, e022120, 2021.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Semiárido (CPATSA) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
Registro Completo
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Agricultura Digital; Embrapa Cerrados. |
Data corrente: |
25/02/2022 |
Data da última atualização: |
25/02/2022 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 1 |
Autoria: |
KOTHARI, K.; BATTISTI, R.; BOOTE, K. J.; ARCHONTOULIS, S. V.; CONFALONE, A.; CONSTANTIN, J.; CUADRA, S. V.; DEBAEKE, P.; FAYE, B.; GRANT, B.; HOOGENBOOM, G.; JING, Q.; VAN DER LAAN, M.; SILVA, F. A. M. da; MARIN, F. R.; NEHBANDANI, A.; NENDEL, C.; PURCELL, L. C.; QIAN, B.; RUANE, A. C.; SCHOVING, C.; SILVA, E. H. F. M.; SMITH, W.; SOLTANI, A.; SRIVASTAVA, A.; VIEIRA JÚNIOR, N. A.; SLONE, S.; SALMERÓN, M. |
Afiliação: |
KRITIKA KOTHARI, UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY; RAFAEL BATTISTI, UFG; KENNETH J. BOOTE, UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA; SOTIRIOS V. ARCHONTOULIS, IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY; ADRIANA CONFALONE, UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DEL CENTRO DE LA PROVINCIA DE BUENOS AIRES; JULIE CONSTANTIN, UNIVERSITÉ DE TOULOUSE; SANTIAGO VIANNA CUADRA, CNPTIA; PHILIPPE DEBAEKE, UNIVERSITÉ DE TOULOUSE; BABACAR FAYE, INSTITUT DE RECHERCHE POUR LE D ́EVELOPPEMENT (IRD) ESPACE-DEV; BRIAN GRANT, AGRICULTURE AND AGRI-FOOD CANADA; GERRIT HOOGENBOOM, UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA; QI JING, AGRICULTURE AND AGRI-FOOD CANADA; MICHAEL VAN DER LAAN, UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA; FERNANDO ANTONIO MACENA DA SILVA, CPAC; FÁBIO RICARDO MARIN, ESALQ/USP; ALIREZA NEHBANDANI, GORGAN UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND NATURAL RESOURCE; CLAAS NENDEL, University of PotsdaM, Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape ResearcH; LARRY C. PURCELL, UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS; BUDONG QIAN, AGRICULTURE AND AGRI-FOOD CANADA; ALEX C. RUANE, NASA GODDARD INSTITUTE FOR SPACE STUDIES; CÉLINE SCHOVING, UNIVERSITÉ DE TOULOUSE, TERRES INOVIA; EVANDRO H. F. M. SILVA, ESALQ/USP; WARD SMITH, AGRICULTURE AND AGRI-FOOD CANADA; AFSHIN SOLTANI, GORGAN UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND NATURAL RE-SOURCES; AMIT SRIVASTAVA, UNIVERSITY OF BONN; NILSON A. VIEIRA JÚNIOR, ESALQ/USP; STACEY SLONE, UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY; MONTSERRAT SALMERÓN, UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY. |
Título: |
Are soybean models ready for climate change food impact assessments? |
Ano de publicação: |
2022 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
European Journal of Agronomy, v. 135, 126482, Apr. 2022. |
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2022.126482 |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Conteúdo: |
Abstract. An accurate estimation of crop yield under climate change scenarios is essential to quantify our ability to feed a growing population and develop agronomic adaptations to meet future food demand. A coordinated evaluation of yield simulations from process-based eco-physiological models for climate change impact assessment is still missing for soybean, the most widely grown grain legume and the main source of protein in our food chain. In this first soybean multi-model study, we used ten prominent models capable of simulating soybean yield under varying temperature and atmospheric CO2 concentration [CO2] to quantify the uncertainty in soybean yield simulations in response to these factors. Models were first parametrized with high quality measured data from five contrasting environments. We found considerable variability among models in simulated yield responses to increasing temperature and [CO2]. For example, under a + 3 °C temperature rise in our coolest location in Argentina, some models simulated that yield would reduce as much as 24%, while others simulated yield increases up to 29%. In our warmest location in Brazil, the models simulated a yield reduction ranging from a 38% decrease under + 3 °C temperature rise to no effect on yield. Similarly, when increasing [CO2] from 360 to 540 ppm, the models simulated a yield increase that ranged from 6% to 31%. Model calibration did not reduce variability across models but had an unexpected effect on modifying yield responses to temperature for some of the models. The high uncertainty in model responses indicates the limited applicability of individual models for climate change food projections. However, the ensemble mean of simulations across models was an effective tool to reduce the high uncertainty in soybean yield simulations associated with individual models and their parametrization. Ensemble, ensemble mean yield responses to temperature and [CO2] were similar to those reported from the literature. Our study is the first demonstration of the benefits achieved from using an ensemble of grain legume models for climate change food projections, and highlights that further soybean model development with experiments under elevated [CO2] and temperature is needed to reduce the uncertainty from the individual models. MenosAbstract. An accurate estimation of crop yield under climate change scenarios is essential to quantify our ability to feed a growing population and develop agronomic adaptations to meet future food demand. A coordinated evaluation of yield simulations from process-based eco-physiological models for climate change impact assessment is still missing for soybean, the most widely grown grain legume and the main source of protein in our food chain. In this first soybean multi-model study, we used ten prominent models capable of simulating soybean yield under varying temperature and atmospheric CO2 concentration [CO2] to quantify the uncertainty in soybean yield simulations in response to these factors. Models were first parametrized with high quality measured data from five contrasting environments. We found considerable variability among models in simulated yield responses to increasing temperature and [CO2]. For example, under a + 3 °C temperature rise in our coolest location in Argentina, some models simulated that yield would reduce as much as 24%, while others simulated yield increases up to 29%. In our warmest location in Brazil, the models simulated a yield reduction ranging from a 38% decrease under + 3 °C temperature rise to no effect on yield. Similarly, when increasing [CO2] from 360 to 540 ppm, the models simulated a yield increase that ranged from 6% to 31%. Model calibration did not reduce variability across models but had an unexpected effect on modifying yield res... Mostrar Tudo |
Palavras-Chave: |
AgMIP; Agricultural Model Intercomparison and Improvement Project; Impacto das mudanças climáticas; Legume model; Model calibration; Model ensemble; Modelos de soja; Temperature Atmospheric CO2 concentration. |
Thesagro: |
Glycine Max; Soja; Temperatura. |
Thesaurus NAL: |
Models; Soybeans; Temperature. |
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/232002/1/AP-Soybean-models-2022.pdf
|
Marc: |
LEADER 04032naa a2200625 a 4500 001 2140426 005 2022-02-25 008 2022 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2022.126482$2DOI 100 1 $aKOTHARI, K. 245 $aAre soybean models ready for climate change food impact assessments?$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2022 520 $aAbstract. An accurate estimation of crop yield under climate change scenarios is essential to quantify our ability to feed a growing population and develop agronomic adaptations to meet future food demand. A coordinated evaluation of yield simulations from process-based eco-physiological models for climate change impact assessment is still missing for soybean, the most widely grown grain legume and the main source of protein in our food chain. In this first soybean multi-model study, we used ten prominent models capable of simulating soybean yield under varying temperature and atmospheric CO2 concentration [CO2] to quantify the uncertainty in soybean yield simulations in response to these factors. Models were first parametrized with high quality measured data from five contrasting environments. We found considerable variability among models in simulated yield responses to increasing temperature and [CO2]. For example, under a + 3 °C temperature rise in our coolest location in Argentina, some models simulated that yield would reduce as much as 24%, while others simulated yield increases up to 29%. In our warmest location in Brazil, the models simulated a yield reduction ranging from a 38% decrease under + 3 °C temperature rise to no effect on yield. Similarly, when increasing [CO2] from 360 to 540 ppm, the models simulated a yield increase that ranged from 6% to 31%. Model calibration did not reduce variability across models but had an unexpected effect on modifying yield responses to temperature for some of the models. The high uncertainty in model responses indicates the limited applicability of individual models for climate change food projections. However, the ensemble mean of simulations across models was an effective tool to reduce the high uncertainty in soybean yield simulations associated with individual models and their parametrization. Ensemble, ensemble mean yield responses to temperature and [CO2] were similar to those reported from the literature. Our study is the first demonstration of the benefits achieved from using an ensemble of grain legume models for climate change food projections, and highlights that further soybean model development with experiments under elevated [CO2] and temperature is needed to reduce the uncertainty from the individual models. 650 $aModels 650 $aSoybeans 650 $aTemperature 650 $aGlycine Max 650 $aSoja 650 $aTemperatura 653 $aAgMIP 653 $aAgricultural Model Intercomparison and Improvement Project 653 $aImpacto das mudanças climáticas 653 $aLegume model 653 $aModel calibration 653 $aModel ensemble 653 $aModelos de soja 653 $aTemperature Atmospheric CO2 concentration 700 1 $aBATTISTI, R. 700 1 $aBOOTE, K. J. 700 1 $aARCHONTOULIS, S. V. 700 1 $aCONFALONE, A. 700 1 $aCONSTANTIN, J. 700 1 $aCUADRA, S. V. 700 1 $aDEBAEKE, P. 700 1 $aFAYE, B. 700 1 $aGRANT, B. 700 1 $aHOOGENBOOM, G. 700 1 $aJING, Q. 700 1 $aVAN DER LAAN, M. 700 1 $aSILVA, F. A. M. da 700 1 $aMARIN, F. R. 700 1 $aNEHBANDANI, A. 700 1 $aNENDEL, C. 700 1 $aPURCELL, L. C. 700 1 $aQIAN, B. 700 1 $aRUANE, A. C. 700 1 $aSCHOVING, C. 700 1 $aSILVA, E. H. F. M. 700 1 $aSMITH, W. 700 1 $aSOLTANI, A. 700 1 $aSRIVASTAVA, A. 700 1 $aVIEIRA JÚNIOR, N. A. 700 1 $aSLONE, S. 700 1 $aSALMERÓN, M. 773 $tEuropean Journal of Agronomy$gv. 135, 126482, Apr. 2022.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Agricultura Digital (CNPTIA) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|